Operator moved the advisor from Opus 5 to Fable 5 and requested a recheck. Fable 5
independently re-verified and CONFIRMED this session's findings (SEC partition=28,
P5=11 with the 101->121-by-design reconstruction, live-check positive controls,
D-143 reconciliation verbs). No result overturned. Edits it surfaced:

- D-143 C.2: added the SEEN-AND-REJECTED note (operator "Octet-preserving confirmed")
  -- the contiguous-/19 regularization alternative was considered and not taken.
- Advisor-identity notes RESOLVED (open-items + roosevelt Section 8, memory): the
  drafting passes were Opus 5 (NOT "fable" -- that inherited label was wrong); the
  recheck pass is Fable 5 (operator-configured, /advisor in-transcript). Do not
  retro-label the Opus-5 rounds as Fable.
- D-137 precision: the teardown discharges only the REVOCATION leg (DC-substrate);
  the ROTATION leg for persistent-host creds stays at v1 close.
- Roosevelt review Section 0.1 (+ CURRENT-STATE): captured two operator-previewed
  changes to the redeploy -- (1) ELIMINATING the dc0/dc1 container layer this rebuild
  (an [ARCH] D-122/D-123 change altering D-143 execution topology; owed a decision at
  redeploy planning), and (2) a PRE-ROOSEVELT BARE-METAL TEST following the redeploy
  (specs in days), which compresses the Group-4 horizon to weeks-away. Hardware specs
  "not yet" -> Group 4 STANDS for this redeploy.

REVERT: git revert this commit.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Fg98z7QyzwYUs8fsWCn728