Operator ruling (GA-R5), exact utterance: "Yes, add the v6 IP sans."
Recorded as a D-109 RULING NOTE (2026-07-29); OPS under GA-R3 -- a
generator change extending an already-ruled principle to a surface D-109
governs -- so no new D-number and next-free stays 138.

The generator now emits IP.1 = this DC's provider v4 leg and IP.2 = its
provider v6 leg, both derived from the same per-DC overlay under R7's $DC
selector. Verified: dc0 -> 10.12.4.57 + 2602:f3e2:f02:11::57; dc1 ->
10.12.64.57 + 2602:f3e2:f03:11::57; and a v4-only control emits NO v6 SAN,
so the generator stays correct on a tree where the dual-stack ADD has not
landed. Admin and internal legs stay EXCLUDED exactly as before --
DOCFIX-067's design has always been provider-leg-only.

Two repo guards fired and both were right: repo-lint L5 rejected a heading
that LED with the D-number (it reads as a second definition -- the third
time this trap has bitten on this branch), and L10 rejected the change for
touching a design-decisions Status line without CURRENT-STATE in the same
commit.

Observation logged, not acted on: amphorae reach the controller on o-hm0's
charm-generated fc00::/64 ULA, not on any VIP leg, so neither SAN matches
that path. Measured upstream, the controller verifies the amphora by UUID;
the reverse direction was not established from source. Settle by inspection
at the Octavia step rather than assuming.

Gauntlet ALL GREEN (85) on vcloud; repo-lint 0 fail / 611 files.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf