Closing the unverified premise D-139 named at ruling time inverted its own
argument. Recorded, flagged for operator reconsideration, NOT amended.

MEASURED, two steps:
 1. jammy libc-bin 2.35-0ubuntu3 ships /etc/gai.conf with ZERO active lines --
    every line commented. The node image applies NO override, so glibc's
    compiled-in table governs.
 2. glibc 2.35 default_precedence[], fetched in full from sourceware at tag
    glibc-2.35 and read rather than recalled, carries glibc's OWN comment
    "See RFC 3484 for the details" and is:
      ::1/128 50 | 2002::/16 30 | ::/96 20 | ::ffff:0:0/96 10 | ::/0 40
    THERE IS NO fc00::/7 ENTRY IN THE PRECEDENCE TABLE.

CONSEQUENCE: ULA falls through to ::/0 = 40, identical to GUA; IPv4-mapped is
10. So on the node image ULA = GUA = 40 and BOTH outrank IPv4. Ruling B was
declared on "ULA loses to IPv4 (3 vs 35), GUA wins (40 vs 35)" -- the RFC 6724
table. RFC 6724 obsoletes RFC 3484 and does define those values, but glibc 2.35
DOES NOT IMPLEMENT IT. Right about the RFC, wrong about the software this cloud
runs. The fc00::/7 entry that does exist is in default_labels[] (label 6), which
drives SOURCE selection rules 5/6 -- a different mechanism, recorded so the two
are not later conflated into "the argument stands after all".

A NEW VARIANT OF THE CITATION CLASS, worth naming: the citation was real,
current and correctly quoted, and still wrong here because nobody checked
whether the IMPLEMENTATION follows the RFC. Checking a source's status and dates
is not sufficient for a standards citation.

SURVIVING REASONS (independent of the refuted one): conformance with Willamette
(a real site) and VR0 DC0, both full GUA; and MINIMIZE DELTA TO ROOSEVELT, whose
2602:f3e2:103::/48 is GUA with no ULA and no plane carve yet. The ruling may well
stand on these -- but under GA-R5 that is the operator's call, since they
answered a question whose stated deciding reason no longer holds.

D-139's text is UNCHANGED. Nothing of D-139 is executed, so nothing is half-built
in either direction. repo-lint 0 fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf