|
D-137 sub-ruling 2 RULED (GA-R5): derive manifests from the matrix
Question as presented: "D-137 ruling 2 of 5 -- derivation ... How do the matrix and the manifests relate?" Operator selection, exact: "Derive manifests from matrix (Recommended)". Matrix becomes SINGLE SOURCE; --render regenerates creds-manifests/*.manifest and the gauntlet fails on rendered-vs-checked-in drift. Kills the dual maintenance the committee flagged as the GA-F06 staleness risk. Accepted cost recorded at ruling time: manifests become generated artifacts, so their governance prose (SEC linkage, mint dates, off-manifest carve-outs, un-consolidated findings) must become matrix FIELDS or be regenerated into the rendered header -- not silently dropped. That prose is load-bearing: it is what recorded the dc0 edge-keypair backfill debt. D-137 stays PROPOSED; sub-rulings 3-5 OPEN; nothing built until all five. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf |
|---|
|
|
| docs/CURRENT-STATE.md |
|---|
| docs/design-decisions.md |
|---|