Stage-3 review sweep C+D: Model B two-root reshape + SEC-010 hardening ...

Phase C (Model B reshape, D-123 operator ruling):
- outer root (opentofu/main.tf): vvr1-dc0 resized to whole-DC containment VM
  (108 vCPU / 425984 MiB / 3221225472000 bytes; expose_nested_virt=true;
  single Office1 transit leg); node/plane/wan/opnsense modules removed from
  vcloud level (MOVED markers), storage-04 added per R-3.
- inner root (opentofu/vr1-dc0-substrate/): NEW second root, provider
  qemu+ssh to vvr1-dc0; reuses ../modules/* verbatim to build 9 nodes +
  6 planes + wan + opnsense inside the containment VM. dmacvicar/libvirt
  0.9.8 pinned (.terraform.lock.hcl committed). Both roots tofu-validate.
- variables.tf: vvr1_dc0_vcpu/memory_mib/disk_bytes with derivation comment.

Phase D (SEC-010, R3-F02): site-headend-install.sh --host-nodes node-host
bootstrap installs qemu-kvm+libvirt, persists+verifies nested=1, writes a
transit FORWARD-drop (nftables inet sec010) enforcing DC-LOCAL under Model B.
Gate hardened (advisor catch): --check now verifies the keyed transit
interface EXISTS, else nftables oifname loads clean but matches nothing
(fail-open). Harness 49/49.

Records: D-103/107/114/121/122/123/124 amendments (append-only);
model-a-fallback-plan synced; ledgers + Phase-C changelog.

KNOWN GAP (OBS-3, operator-confirmed 2026-07-16): under Model B the inner
vr1-dc0-wan NAT is nested inside vvr1-dc0 (single transit NIC), severing the
simulated-ISP egress that Model A had at vcloud level. DC0/DC1 ARE meant to
have ISP connections -- egress path resolution is follow-up design work, not
resolved by this commit.

Present-only; not pushed. Gauntlet ALL GREEN (63); repo-lint 0 fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01Ck6xh3jWQi5b3Su8Dx1LEH

DOCFIX-147: opentofu/modules/maas-vm-host + modules/netem-link ...

Registers the vcloud host with MAAS as a virsh VM host, and applies tc netem
WAN-simulation parameters -- the two remaining unbuilt mechanisms from the
OpenTofu scope, researched before drafting per instruction.

maas-vm-host uses canonical/maas's maas_vm_host (register the chassis so
MAAS discovers already-existing VMs), deliberately not maas_vm_host_machine
(composes new VMs itself -- takes cores/memory/disks as inputs). Read both
schemas and cross-checked against D-103's explicit "MAAS does NOT compose
new ones" before picking one.

netem-link uses terraform_data (OpenTofu's own recommended replacement for
null_resource) with an SSH-wrapped local-exec provisioner -- confirmed
local-exec runs on the machine invoking tofu apply (Office1 per D-103), not
the vcloud host where the bridges live, so a bare local command would do
nothing useful.

Neither module instantiated: needs a real MAAS zone/pool, the vcloud host's
SSH target, and real netem parameters, none of which exist yet.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01QrcJx8TUar7pYAvpGJw57A