v6 carve complete 54/54; controller v6 restored; Juju re-point blocked on a credential mint ...

v6: applied=54 errors=0, read back 54/54. Ran after the v4 carve because the
provider v6 static lands on br-ex. The tool walks only the nine tagged role
nodes, so the controller's metal-admin v6 was applied separately -- restoring
ruled state the re-enrolment dropped. Its provider GUA stays deliberately absent.

Juju survey on the rack: cloud still points at the OFFICE1 region, which is what
killed bootstrap 3. juju unregister is NOT needed -- no controllers registered.

Blocker: the new region has no juju-vr1-dc0 MAAS user. Re-establishing it mints
a new API key, so it is operator-gated. Nothing was minted; the refusal was a
permission rule failing to match, not a classifier fault.

Gauntlet ALL GREEN (93); repo-lint 0 fail.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf

dc0 v4 node carve COMPLETE: 10/10 machines, gate 134/0, diff vs pre-migration EMPTY ...

Canary-first then node by node, never batched. 11 + 13x8 + 4 mutations, every one
read back. Nine role nodes on six planes with OVS br-ex; the juju controller on
two planes raw with no br-ex and enp3-6 left on auto VLANs.

Verified by diffing against the Office1 pre-migration capture: every node's six
v4 legs match address for address. Compared by LEG SET, since system_id and
hostname are both re-minted at re-enlistment.

Instrument note: the first extraction read the wrong capture field and returned
'-' for every old address, which would have read as 'the old region had no
statics'. Caught by the implausible shape, not by the parse.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf

dc-node-carve: convert the commissioning auto link, found by a live dry-run ...

The first live plan refused enp1s0 on every machine: it holds an `auto` link on
metal-admin out of enlistment, and the "wrong address on the right subnet is a
FAILURE" rule was too broad. A commissioning link is the expected starting
state, not a conflict -- so the tool could not carve the metal-admin leg at all.

Narrowed BY MODE: auto/dhcp/link_up gets unlinked and re-created as STATIC
(MAAS will not convert a link's mode in place); a `static` link with the wrong
address is still refused, because something deliberate put it there.

The `raw` fixture modelled the auto link correctly -- what was missing was any
assertion that `apply` over the raw state EXITS 0. T21-T24 only grepped for
planned strings, so a refusal on the very first NIC read as green. T26/T27 now
cover both directions and both are mutation-proven.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf

dc-node-carve.sh: the v4 node interface carve, mutation-proven 40/40 ...

The last no-tool gap between the dc0 region migration and the Juju deploy:
60 NIC re-homes, 9 OVS br-ex bridges, 54 statics. The Stage-4 equivalent was
done ad-hoc and logged outside the repo, so there was nothing to re-run when
D-132 q1 forced a re-enrolment.

Proved the four-call MAAS cycle on ONE live interface (canary 6q4syf enp3s0)
before writing the tool -- nothing had exercised `interface update vlan=` on a
link_up-only interface on an auto fabric, which is the state all 60 NICs are in.
Measured in passing: link-subnet REPLACES a link_up link, so only the br-ex
member needs an explicit unlink.

No default profile; maas-profile-assert.sh before any read or write; every id
resolved live by stable key (boot MAC / CIDR / interface name); every mutation
read back and compared. Role asymmetry derived from the host token, and the
controller's deliberately-uncarved NICs are asserted ABSENT.

Mutation pass found the br-ex static compare could not fail -- Pattern B was
being caught by the type/parent assertions instead. Added the brexip fixture
and re-proved the kill. Also found that neutering an assertion's MESSAGE only
proves it exists, not that its predicate works.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf