Branch dc-dc-stage4-phase3-maas-deploy. Session resumed the DC1 Stage-5 bundle-rework blocker under a committee review (operator-requested). Status lives ONLY in docs/CURRENT-STATE.md (GA-R1); this changelog is the review surface -- each item states what / why / revert. No cloud state was mutated this session.
What: new docs/audit/committee-20260724-track2-bundle-render.md -- a 4-lens (Roosevelt-delta / HA-DR / operational-risk / Juju-MAAS-mechanism) read-only committee review of the vr1-dc1 deploy-artifact render, with the adjudication and open operator decisions. Advisory/audit record; adopts nothing (GA-R5). Why: operator: "Deploy a committee to review Track 2 and provide recommendations based on overall end project goals and decisions already researched." Durable, citable authority (commissioning-committee precedent). Revert: git rm docs/audit/committee-20260724-track2-bundle-render.md.
What: new docs/audit/stage5-controller-capacity-20260724.txt -- captured scripts/dc-dc-whole-host-budget.py runs: baseline built layout 3+2+4 x2 DC = 838/1024 GiB (82%, FIT); +controller (+8 GiB/+4 vCPU per-DC containment overhead) = 854/1024 GiB (83%, FIT, 170 GiB headroom). Read-only calculator; nothing queried live. Why: GA-R1 -- the Fork-1 (a) capacity claim must be MEASURED, not inferred (the signed doc's 790/77% is the OLD 8-node layout). Gate = PASS. Revert: git rm docs/audit/stage5-controller-capacity-20260724.txt.
What: appended a D-104 amendment (2026-07-24) in docs/design-decisions.md recording the operator's GA-R5 ruling -- the per-DC Juju controller is a DEDICATED 10th node VM (distinct tag juju-controller-vr1-dc1, no role tag), separate from the 9 Option C role nodes; additive (for_each-keyed); capacity gate PASS (cites item 2); the 9-node D-121 layout is unchanged. Why: Fork 1 was the blocking architectural decision; operator selected "Dedicated 10th VM (Recommended)" over shrink-a-role and co-locate. Controller placement is D-104's subject; recorded as its amendment (not a new D-number). Revert: delete the "### D-104 -- AMENDMENT (2026-07-24)" block in docs/design-decisions.md (git range-diff of this commit).
What: rewrote the Stage-4 bullet's render sub-bullets: committee-adjudicated; Fork 1 RULED (a) + capacity gate; Fork 2/3 as OPS committee-unanimous recommendations (gated at execution); BUNDLEFIX-052 fixed; a corrected NEXT list. Also corrected an earlier inaccurate characterization (dc-ha-scaleup is not "stale ceph-osd 3" -- it deliberately excludes ceph-osd) and the "consumes 1 of 9" arithmetic (now a dedicated 10th VM). Why: GA-R1/C1 -- a status-changing commit updates CURRENT-STATE in the SAME commit (repo-lint L10). Status authority stays single-sourced. Revert: restore the prior Stage-4 bullet text (git range-diff of this commit).
bindings:What: removed an orphaned 4-space-indented bindings: block in bundle.yaml (old line ~907) that yaml.safe_load take-last had absorbed into ceph-rbd-mirror, clobbering its real ceph-local/ceph-remote (replication) + nrpe-external-master bindings (D-108/D-052) and injecting a phantom dashboard binding (a charm with no such endpoint) -> juju deploy validation reject. Why: confirmed pre-existing latent defect (committee mechanism lens; verified via yaml.safe_load). Fork-independent; fix now so the dc1 render starts clean. Validation: yaml.safe_load confirms ceph-rbd-mirror.bindings restored to {'': metal-admin, ceph-local: replication, ceph-remote: replication, nrpe-external-master: metal-internal}; provider-bundle-check.py bundle.yaml PASS. Revert: re-insert the orphan block after the vault-hacluster comment (not advised -- it is the bug).
What: extended scripts/provider-bundle-check.py with (a) --overlay FILE (juju-like merge, so the checker validates the EFFECTIVE deploy input), (b) --dc vr1-dc0|vr1-dc1 selecting expected VIP bands (default dc0 = base bundle, so an un-parameterized run is byte-identical to before), and (c) placement invariants that activate ONLY on a role-separated bundle (machines tagged control/compute/storage) and self-skip on the base/un-rendered bundle: no dangling to:; LXD containers on control, ceph-osd on storage, nova-compute on compute; each num_units>=2 app spread across that many DISTINCT machines (anti-affinity); ceph-osd == storage count, nova-compute == compute count. Dropped the "controller-tag" idea (the controller is the bootstrap machine, not a bundle machine -- verified at the MAAS-tagging step). Why: the committee's non-negotiable "spine" -- the checker was placement-blind, so any render could silently ship decorative HA. Makes the hand-render machine-checked; also closes the committee's dc1-VIP-outside-the-check gap. Caveat (VERIFY-LIVE): the checker's machines-block overlay merge MIRRORS juju's documented behavior; the actual machines-retag-via-overlay is confirmed at juju deploy --dry-run before deploy (no offline juju merger exists). Fallback if it does not take: inline the dc1 tags into a rendered bundle. Validation: harness tests/provider-bundle-check/run-tests.sh 15/15 (7 new behavioral cases). Gauntlet ALL GREEN (78). repo-lint 0 fail. Revert: git checkout <this-commit>~ -- scripts/provider-bundle-check.py tests/provider-bundle-check/run-tests.sh.
What: rendered bundle.yaml from VR0's 4-node hyperconverged layout to VR1 dc1's 9-node role-separated one: machines block "8"-"11" (tags=openstack) -> "0"-"8" with role+DC tags (block style -- flow {...} would split the comma-tag); every app to: re-homed (mysql/ovn-central/ceph-mon -> control 0/1/2; nova-compute 3->2 on compute 3/4; ceph-osd -> storage 5/6/7/8; the 14 scaled apps -> control placeholder that the overlay spreads; utilities -> control); ovn-chassis MACs -> the 2 dc1 compute provider NICs. Rendered overlays/dc-ha-scaleup.yaml tokens -> logical control ids 0/1/2 (now DC-neutral) + updated its header + fixed the stale ceph-osd-3 comment. New overlays/vr1-dc1-machines.yaml (per-DC retag; machines-overlay merge is VERIFY-LIVE at juju deploy --dry-run). Why: the committee-adjudicated render (Fork 2 = hand-render now); unblocks the dc1 Stage-5 deploy. Done as an asserted one-shot line-transform (preserves all D-NNN comments) reviewed via git diff + the validator. Validation: provider-bundle-check.py bundle.yaml (base standalone) PASS; the FULL dc1 deploy input (--overlay vr1-dc1-machines --overlay vr1-dc1-vips --overlay dc-ha-scaleup --dc vr1-dc1) PASS; harness 15/15; gauntlet ALL GREEN (78); repo-lint 0-fail. The validator CAUGHT a real render bug (YAML flow-comma dropping the role tag) -- exactly its purpose. Revert: git checkout <this-commit>~ -- bundle.yaml overlays/dc-ha-scaleup.yaml + git rm overlays/vr1-dc1-machines.yaml.
What: (a) provider-bundle-check.py -- computes role_sep early; the ovn-chassis MAC check now skips the VR0 openstack0-3 Pattern-A set on a role-separated bundle (verifies present + well-formed instead), since dc chassis are the compute-node provider MACs. (b) new docs/audit/stage5-expansion-review-20260724.md -- three read-only reviewer verdicts (relations/bindings/cross-DC; config/pins; deploy-scripts), dispositioned (handled / follow-up / VERIFY-LIVE / resolve-before-deploy / no-change). Why: the operator-requested deployment-script expansion review; captures the cross-connection/pinning/gate findings durably so the Chat design session (NetBox-deploy coupling) reads them from the repo. Validation: harness 15/15 (T9's role-sep fixture exercises the ovn role-sep branch); gauntlet ALL GREEN (78). Revert: git checkout <this-commit>~ -- scripts/provider-bundle-check.py + git rm docs/audit/stage5-expansion-review-20260724.md.
Commit+push this batch (GA-R5: rulings land before dependent work). Then, each operator-gated: per-role MAAS tags; author + apply the 10th controller VM (egress OPEN); render the 9-node bundle.yaml (re-home base placements, re-scope tokens) + extend provider-bundle-check.py with placement assertions + wire overlays + de-stale phase-4 Step 4; gated juju bootstrap (by controller tag, egress OPEN) -> deploy. Deploy-time VERIFY-LIVE gates: vault-3-unit HA-on-MySQL, hacluster cluster_count:3, dc1 VIPs, CRUSH failure-domain=host.