D-137 sub-ruling 3 RULED (GA-R5): remote discovery = declared locations only
Question as presented: "D-137 ruling 3 of 5 -- remote discovery scope ... The
tension is tenant isolation on a commercial multi-tenant cloud." Operator
selection, exact: "Declared locations only (Recommended)". Dated 2026-07-26 --
this session crossed the date boundary; sub-rulings 1-2 were pushed 2026-07-25.

A declared list (creds-manifests/vm-secret-locations, <host-role> <path>) bounds
--remote absolutely; it never walks outside the list. No tenant surface touched,
D-069 custody boundary and hard-isolation posture preserved, fast on a live
region.

Records a faithful-implementation note (NOT an override): the list must be
populated with everything already known to hold credential material or the
ruling leaves measured defects uncovered -- per-site creds folders on the
headend as well as the jumphost (SEC-022 shadow stores), the region secrets
dir (SEC-020), and the three directories outside the SEC-009 convention found
by the creation-point inventory. Accepted residual: a secret minted at an
undeclared location stays invisible, so adding a row is part of DoD for any new
mint site.

D-137 stays PROPOSED; sub-rulings 4-5 OPEN; nothing built until all five.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01HvCyrwvYTTcDYnRErfMsNf
1 parent df8fa21 commit aa67634b84b3019f09aad88b07563bf5d5df9f46
@JANeumatrix JANeumatrix authored 16 hours ago
Showing 2 changed files
View
docs/CURRENT-STATE.md
View
docs/design-decisions.md